Legal Opinion
M. C. Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Texas Foundries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 21, 1975No. 74-2246PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs, M. C. Manufacturing Company, Inc. (M.C.), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Universal Automatic Machine Company, Inc. (Universal), initiated this private antitrust action against defendants, Texas Foundries, Inc. (Texas Foundries) and H/R Products, Inc. (H/R), alleging that the defendants conspired to restrain trade in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, through the utilization of a price discrimination scheme which also was violative of Section 2 of the Clayton Act as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(a & f). Trial to a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- John J. Terrell, Plaintiff-Appelle v. Household Goods Carriers' BureauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. And Petroleum Products Co. v. Texaco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Charlotte Fusco and Daniel Boe v. Xerox CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Lewis v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Turner v. American Bar Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1975
- Delong Equipment Company v. Washington Mills Abrasive CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.