Legal Opinion
New 52 Project v. Proctor, 07ap-487 (2-7-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 2008No. 07AP-487PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, New 52 Project, Inc. ("appellant"), appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, in which that court granted the motion of defendant-appellee, Gordon Proctor, Director of the Ohio Department of Transportation ("appellee"), to dismiss appellant's complaint pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6).
{¶ 2} Appellant advances one assignment of error for our review:
THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS WHEN THE COMPLAINT STATED A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED.
{¶ 3} Civ.R. 12(B)(6) authorizes a defendant to assert by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Guernsey County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Perrysburg Township v. City of RossfordOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Grace v. KochOhio Supreme Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Washington Mutual Bank v. Beatley, 06ap-1189 (4-8-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- New 52 Project, Inc. v. Proctor, Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- New 52 Project, Inc. v. Proctor, Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 2009