New 52 Project, Inc. v. Proctor, Ohio Department of Transportation
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 1} Today we must decide whether a court of common pleas has jurisdiction to decide whether an easement for a state highway has been abandoned. Because we hold that R.C. Chapter 5511 gives the director of transportation the exclusive authority to abandon or vacate portions of the state highway system, we answer that question in the negative. Accordingly we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the judgment of the trial court dismissing the complaint.
Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 2} In 1959, Lillian Parsons deeded an easement through a portion of her property, in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Shemo v. City of Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- West Park Shopping Center, Inc. v. MasheterOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Houck v. Board of Park CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Bigler v. Township of YorkOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- New 52 Project v. Proctor, 07ap-487 (2-7-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
3Cited by6 opinions
- Malloy v. ReyesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Edgington v. NewmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. MirandaOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.