Legal Opinion

Cottonwood Hill, Inc. v. Ansay

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1985No. 84CA0828PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Judge.

This action arises from an option exercised by plaintiff-lessee Cottonwood Hill, Inc. (Cottonwood) for purchase of certain property from defendants-lessors, Ronald J. and Clara E. Ansay (Ansay). Both parties appeal. We affirm.

Pursuant to its lease agreement with An-say, Cottonwood exercised its option to purchase by notifying Ansay in September 1988. The purchase option clause also provided that the purchase price was to be determined by appraisal of the property and that Cottonwood could purchase at such appraised price provided that that price was not less than $575,000. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Adler v. AdlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  2. Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. Berglund-Cherne Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. Perl-Mack Enterprises Co. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. Travelers Insurance Co. v. GasperColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Ruark v. PetersonColorado Court of Appeals · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Saturn Systems, Inc. v. MilitareColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Buckley Powder Co. v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Montemayor v. Jacor Communications, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Mulei v. Jet Courier Service, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Silverberg v. ColantunoColorado Court of Appeals · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API