Legal Opinion
Ruark v. Peterson
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided November 2, 1971No. 70-138PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
491 P.2d 75 (1971)
Walter RUARK, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Norman J. PETERSON and Barbara J. Peterson, Defendants in Error.
No. 70-138.
Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.
November 2, 1971.
John F. Mueller, Denver, for plaintiff in error.
Paul Q. Beacom and Ott & Caskins, William J. Caskins, Jr., Richard Ott, Denver, for defendants in error.
Selected for Official Publication.
SILVERSTEIN, Chief Judge.
This is an action for specific performance of an option contract. It was brought by the optionees, the Petersons, who are defendants in error here. After a trial to the court, judgment was entered granting…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. VieringIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
- Coppom v. HumphreysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Howard v. Interstate Development CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
3Cited by10 opinions
- Richard Barton Enterprises, Inc. v. TsernUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Northwest Television Club, Inc. v. Gross Seattle, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- Pitman v. SanditenTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Cottonwood Hill, Inc. v. AnsayColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Kysar Insurance Agency, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.