Foss-Hughes Co. v. Norman
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Rodney, J.,
delivering the opinion of the court:
It is contended by the plaintiff that his previously existing contract to purchase the motor vehicle was rescinded by the subsequent correspondence; that thereafter the Foss-Hughes *110Company simply retained the deposit, theretofore made, to be applied on account of the purchase price of a motor, vehicle in case he, Norman, subsequently decided to purchase one, but that there was no liability upon him to make such purchase. The plaintiff contends, in short, that the pre-existing contract was rescinded by mutual consent as evidenced by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hansbrough v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Bacon v. CobbIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Miller v. SteenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Rhoades v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
- Pierce v. StaubSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lee Builders, Inc. v. WellsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
- Thach v. DurhamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Lee Builders v. WellsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
- Simms v. BoveeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949