Aiken v. Castro
Superior Court of Guam
1Opinion of the Court
. FILED SUPiOR CCURT ‘ 0: “ r EV _;\\ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM MORGAN MKEN, III, Superior Court Case No. CVOO$4-19 P1aintiff DECISION AND ORDER RE VS. V DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, PLAINTIFF’S CATHERINE M.R. CASTRO and EDWARD MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, CASTRO, AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE Defendants. The Court here considers Defendants Catherine M.R. Castro and Edward Castro’s Motion for Reconsideration and Plaintiff Morgan Aiken III’s Motion for Reconsideration, both of which ask the Court to reconsider its February 16, 2021 Decision and Order re Defendants’ Motion for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Sosinsky v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Neill Hannon v. Security National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Plumley v. MockettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Ginsberg v. GamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012