Legal Opinion

State v. Morgan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 2003No. 25453PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.

A jury found Kim David Morgan (“Defendant”) guilty of two counts of selling a controlled substance (methamphetamine) in violation of section 195.211.1 He was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender. See § 558.016.3. Defendant urges reversal because he claims there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict and the trial court erred by sentencing him as a prior and persistent offender. We reverse in part; we affirm in part.

This court accepts as true all evidence favorable to the State, including all favorable inferences that may be drawn from the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. WithrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. State v. ClineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. State v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. State v. BooyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State v. ShockleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morgan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. State v. MorganMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API