Legal Opinion

State v. Shockley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 2003No. 24792, 24791PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES K. PREWITT, Presiding Judge.

Following jury trial, Thomas Shockley (“Defendant”) was convicted of burglary in the second degree, § 569.170, RSMo 2000, and felony stealing, § 570.030, RSMo 2000. With four points relied on, Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on both counts and contends that trial court plainly erred in instructing the jury in the disjunctive on the alternatives that Defendant either acted together with or aided Janie Easling in the commission of the alleged crimes.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, the following evidence was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. WurtzbergerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  2. State v. BradshawMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. MoriartyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. HughesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State v. PuigMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. FarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. SistrunkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. BiggsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. NealMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. HolmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API