Legal Opinion
James v. Hiller
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 22, 1958No. 6527PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINDES, Justice.
Russell Hiller, plaintiff below and appellee herein, sued S. Marvin James and wife to recover a real estate commission in the sum of $3,500 for causing the sale of defendants’ property located in Tucson, Arizona. The trial court rendered judgment for the plaintiff in the amount claimed. Defendants appeal.
The controlling facts are that plaintiff is a real estate broker with offices in New Mexico and is licensed by that state to transact such business therein but is not licensed by the state of Arizona. In Tucson the parties apparently had orally understood that plaintiff was to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cochran v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Tillman v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1936
- McGillivray v. CronrathIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by15 opinions
- Consul Limited, Kenneth B. Wilson Dba Ken Wilson Associates v. Solide Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, and Hrh Operating Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Tanenbaum v. Sylvan Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Arizona Land Title & Trust Co. v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Schoene v. HickamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Richland Development Company, Inc. And National Pool Equipment Company v. George Staples, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.