Legal Opinion

Mizzell v. Ewell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1975No. 751SC500PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Petitioners contend that the trial court committed reversible error by granting defendants’ motion for directed verdict of dismissal at the close of petitioners’ evidence. They argue that the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to their case would establish their claim of title by adverse possession. We cannot agree.

In order to establish title by adverse possession there must be actual possession with an intent to hold solely for the possessor to the exclusion of others. The claimant must exercise acts of dominion over the land in making the ordinary use and taking the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. GaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Price v. Tomrich CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Brewer v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Lindsay v. CarswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Mallet v. HuskeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Skvarla v. ParkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Stone v. ConderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Crisp v. BenfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Canady v. CliffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Cassada v. CassadaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API