Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. Carswell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1954No. 308PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The plaintiff has preserved twelve of his nineteen exceptions and assignments of error based thereon. However, in disposing of this appeal we deem it necessary to consider only exceptions Nos. 14, 15, and 18.

Exception No. 14 is to the finding of fact set out in paragraph (c) here-inabove to the effect that the defendants’ title and each mesne conveyance therein embraces the same boundaries and lands specifically described in the answer of Florence Ethel Butler and Roy Butler. The fallacy in this finding of fact is that the deeds offered by the defendants in an effort to show adverse…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Locklear v. . SavageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Vance v. . GuySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Alexander v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Berry v. . CoppersmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Doe on the Demise of Loftin v. CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1854

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Price v. Tomrich CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Carrow v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Scott v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Bowers v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API