State v. Clemenson
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Hancock District Court.- — How. Clieeord p.' 'Smith, Judge. The defendant, with two others, was indicted for the crime of having entered into a conspiracy to commit adultery. From judgment of conviction, he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
i. conspiracy adultery. The ajrpellant contends there is no such crime as conspiracy to commit adultery. The statute provides that “if any two or more persons conspire or confederate together with the fraudulent or malicious intent, wrongfully to injure the person, character, business, property or rights in property of another, or to do any illegal act injurious to the public trade, health, morals or police, or to the administration of public justice, or to commit any felony, they are guilty of a conspiracy and every such offender and every person who is convicted of a conspiracy at common…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. DonovanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- State v. OrmistonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Shannon v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Earl Christopher Hunter, United States of America v. Hyland HillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Old Monastery Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- State v. MaddenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.