Legal Opinion

State v. Grant

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 10, 1892PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from Hamilton District Court. — Hon. D. R„ Hindman, Judge. The defendants were indicted, convicted and sentenced for a conspiracy, and appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

It appears that in April, 1888, the defendant Cole Grant came to Webster county, Iowa,, and on the thirteenth of the same month made a contract under the name of Cole Grant & Co. with Breece & Breece of Ft. Dodge to manufacture a combination slat and wire fence, which he had the right to manufacture and sell in that county. He procured from said firm ‘a certificate that they had entered into such a contract with Cole G-rant & Co. He then employed a. number of men, among them the defendant, McNeal, to establish agencies among the farmers, authorizing said agents, by written and printed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Spies v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. State v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1821
  3. Card v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Commonwealth v. JuddMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  5. State v. WinnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Berry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. MaddenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. State v. CroffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API