Carroll v. United Steelworkers of America
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTLEY, Justice.
Michael A. Carroll appeals from the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment to the United Steelworkers of America. We affirm.
Carroll’s complaint alleged that on September 18, 1975, he was employed by Bunker Hill Company, and while working below a skip cage was injured when the skip fell upon him due to a defect that existed in the hoist. This defect was discoverable by reasonable inspection. The complaint further alleged that the Union owed Carroll, a Union member, the duty of due care, and breached that duty in that:
The Defendant United Steelworkers of America…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Just's, Inc. v. Arrington Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Taylor v. HerboldIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
- Dunbar v. United Steelworkers of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- House v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rawson v. United Steelworkers of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Hudson v. CobbsIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Rhodes v. Sunshine Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Selkirk Seed Co. v. State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Bishop v. OwensIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.