Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Herbold

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1971No. 10541PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an action by plaintiff in two counts, one for breach of a contract to purchase potatoes and, secondly, for tortious damages arising from said breach of contract. Following trial to a jury, a verdict was returned for the plaintiff on each count. Thereafter, the trial court granted defendants’ motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the second count. Defendants have appealed and plaintiff has cross-appealed. We affirm the action of the trial court.

Plaintiff-respondent and cross-appellant (hereinafter plaintiff) was at the time of the transactions herein a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Adams v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Atlantic & Pacific Railroad v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Farm Development Corporation v. HernandezIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Olsen v. HawkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Owen v. Taylor Ex Rel. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Just's, Inc. v. Arrington Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Thomas v. Medical Center Physicians, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Obray v. MitchellIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. McAlvain v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Quincy v. JOINT SCHOOL DIST. NO. 41, ETC.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API