Bishop v. Owens
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentHorton, J.
I respectfully dissent from the Court’s conclusion that Shelton’s claim abated upon her death. I do so because I believe that her claim of breach of contract stated a claim upon which relief can be granted, and therefore, the cause of action did not abate.
This Court has long recognized that the duties owed in tort cases are those imposed by law, and do not have their origins in the explicit terms of the parties’ contract.2 Recently, in Weinstein v. Prudential Property and Cas. Ins. Co., 149 Idaho 299, 233 P.3d 1221 (2010), this Court addressed an earlier decision in Inland Group of Companies,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- White v. Unigard Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Just's, Inc. v. Arrington Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Weinstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Taylor v. HerboldIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
- Denning v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.