State v. Bullock
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*526COZORT, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of two counts of felonious larceny and sentenced to ten years in prison. On appeal the defendant contends primarily that the trial court erred on two evidentiary questions. First, he argues that the court admitted hearsay evidence, the statements of a State’s witness who refused to comply with a subpoena, in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 8C-1, Rule 804(b)(5). Secondly, he maintains that the court admitted evidence of “other crimes, wrongs, or acts” in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 8C-1, Rule 404(b). We find no error.
The State offered evidence tending to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. TriplettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CarriganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. FinneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. BullockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989