Legal Opinion

State v. McLaughlin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1986No. 240A85PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The defendant brings forward assignments of error in which he contends that the trial court erred in admitting an accomplice’s confession under the North Carolina Rules of Evidence, N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 804(b)(5) (Cum. Supp. 1985), and that the trial court erred in refusing to give the defendant’s requested special instruction regarding the accomplice’s confession. We conclude that the trial court erred in admitting the accomplice’s confession under Rule 804(b)(5), thereby entitling the defendant to a new trial.

The State presented evidence which tended to show that on 21…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend HofstadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Milton Edward BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  3. State v. TriplettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. United States v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. AgubataCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API