Legal Opinion
Cave v. Singletary
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 22, 1996No. 94-3397PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Per curiam
Alphonso Cave appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for enforcement of the writ of habeas corpus previously issued by the court. Cave argues that the district court was clearly erroneous in its determination that his attorney agreed to postpone the date for resentencing beyond the time period set forth in the district court’s prior order granting the writ. He also argues that the district court erred in its conclusion that the prior order permitted postponement by consent of the parties. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In 1982 Cave was convicted of first degree murder, armed robbery, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Donald TeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Alphonso Cave, Cross-Appellant v. Harry K. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Foudy v. Indian River County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- People v. EmersonIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- Antonio Carrizosa v. Chiquita Brands InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Nebula Glass International, Inc. v. Reichhold, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Alley v. U.S. Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.