Legal Opinion
Nebula Glass International, Inc. v. Reichhold, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 30, 2006No. 04-14228PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARCUS, Circuit Judge:
In this contract action, Reichhold, Inc. appeals from the entry of final judgment in the amount of $22.5 million in favor of the plaintiff, Nebula Glass International, Inc. d.b.a. Glasslam N.G.I., Inc. (“Glasslam”). A jury found that Reichhold supplied Glasslam with a defective product (resin), which constituted a breach of contract, breach of express warranty, and breach of implied warranty. On appeal, Reichhold argues that the district court erred in denying its Rule 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law on Glasslam’s claims for certain future glass replacement…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Joseph R. Campbell v. Rainbow City, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Royal Typewriter Company, a Division of Litton Business Systems, Inc., a Corporation v. Xerographic Supplies Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Twyman v. RoellSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Abel v. DubberlyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Dolgencorp, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Proudfoot Consulting Co. v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Minks v. Polaris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Zhou Hua Zhu v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Nurse "Be" v. Columbia Palms West Hospital Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.