Legal Opinion

United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 22, 2015No. 13-5028, 14-5161PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, the fifth in this long-running RICO case .against the nation’s cigarette manufacturers, defendants challenge a district court order requiring that they add two statements to their cigarette packages and advertisements: an announcement that a federal court has ruled that they “deliberately deceived the American public” about the dangers of cigarettes; and a declaration that they “intentionally designed cigarettes” to maximize addiction. Reading the extensive briefs the parties and their amici have submitted, one might think this case presents thorny,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. Blum v. BaconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  2. Bifolck v. Philip MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Antwan HeywardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  4. United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  5. Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API