Legal Opinion

United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 1, 2016No. 15-5210PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

This is the latest appeal in the government’s long-running RICO case against the nation’s major cigarette manufacturers. Ten years ago, the district court issued a comprehensive remedial order, which included a requirement that defendants and their successors televise “corrective statements” about the dangers of smoking. Eight years later, one defendant, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (RJR), sought to dissolve that order as void under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) and unjust under Rule 60(b)(6). The district court denied RJR’s motion, and we affirm. As the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Roger Severino v. Joseph Biden, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
  2. Cause of Action Institute v. OMBCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
  3. FTC v. Gary HewittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  4. Marcos Montes v. Janitorial Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  5. Thec International-Hamdard Cordova Group-Nazari Constr. Co. v. Cohen Mohr, LLPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API