Ironwood Water-works Co. v. Trebilcock
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Gogebic. (Haire, J.) Relators applied to the circuit court for mandamus to-compel the respondents to issue certain bonds in payment, for water-works. Respondents bring certiorari to review orders .granting the writs. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The city of Ironwood, Mich., and the unincorporated village of Hurley, in the state of Wisconsin, are situated on the opposite sides of the Montreal river, the boundary line between Michigan and Wisconsin. The Ironwood Water-works Company is a private corporation, duly organized October 10, 1890, under chapter 84, How. Stat., for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, and operating .water-works in the city of Ironwood, and supplying the city and its inhabitants with water for public and *456private use. The Hurley Water Company is a like corporation, duly organized July 26, 1890, under…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mayor of Baltimore v. GillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Litchfield v. BallouSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Memphis & Little Rock Railroad v. Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
3Cited by14 opinions
- Voss v. Waterloo Water Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Burnham v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Scott v. City of LaporteIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Renfroe v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Walinske v. Detroit-Wayne Joint Building AuthorityMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.