Legal Opinion

Gayman, County Treasurer v. Mullen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1916No. 7590PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from District Court, Lincoln County; Chas. B. • Wilson, Jr., Judge. Action by Mary A. Mullen against John J. Gayman, county treasurer, and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bing error.

1Opinion of the CourtThacker, J.

The plaintiffs in error will be designated as defendants; and the defendant in error as plaintiff, in accord with their, respective titles in the trial court. >

This is an action by plaintiff against defendants to vacate and set aside a special assessment of $2,280, based upon a finding of a drainage benefit, and to perpetually enjoin the collection of the same, against her southwest quarter of section 15, in township. 14 north, range 2 east, of the Indian meridian, in Lincoln county, as a part of Deep Fork drainage district No. 1, of said, county, under Laws 1907-08, pp. 295-315, as amended…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hibben v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Norris v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. People Ex Rel. Canajoharie National Bank v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. County Council v. Carl M. Freeman Associates Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. First National Bank of Pauls Valley v. CrudupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. La Prade v. CoxArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Private Truck Council of America, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. State Ex Rel. Osage County Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WortenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API