Legal Opinion

Wiedemer v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 4, 1989No. 88SA384PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey

This is an appeal of a denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus and we have jurisdiction pursuant to section 13-4-102(l)(e), 6A C.R.S. (1987). The appellant, Gary L. Wiedemer, seeks his unconditional release from the custody of the Department of Corrections (the Department). First, Wiedemer argues that his good time and earned time credits are irrevocable and thus preclude his reincarceration for a parole violation. Second, Wiedemer claims that he should have been discharged because he did not receive an answer to his petition for writ of habeas corpus within the twenty days required by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Qureshi v. District Court Ex Rel. Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Bynum v. KautzkySupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. People v. CalyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. Santisteven v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. NortonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. Jones v. MartinezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Meyers v. PriceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Thorson v. Colorado Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Pearson v. DiesslinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API