Legal Opinion

People v. Norton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 21, 2003No. 02SC91PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

We granted certiorari in this case to consider whether a mandatory parolee who is incarcerated after committing a new crime while on parole may have his presentence confinement credit (“PSCC”) applied toward the sentence resulting from the new charge, or must have it apply toward the sentence for which he was on parole.1 In addressing this question, we specifically consider the scope and effect of section 18-1.3-405, 6 C.R.S. (2002)2 on mandatory parolees who commit a new offense while on parole in light of the 1988 amendment to that statute and the General Assembly’s 1993 amendments to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. Schubert v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. Thiret v. KautzkySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. People v. LutherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. RockwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  2. Carlson v. FerrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  3. Simpson v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  4. People Ex Rel. J.R.T. v. MartinezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  5. People v. WallinColorado Court of Appeals · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API