Legal Opinion

Santisteven v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 7, 1988No. 86SA222PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRSHBAUM, Justice.

Appellant Harold Benny Johnson, Superintendent of the Fremont Correctional Facility (Superintendent), appeals a trial court order requiring the Department of Corrections (the Department) to grant appellee, Arthur Santisteven (Santisteven), certain credits for periods of confinement against the mandatory release date established by the Department with respect to two consecutive sentences imposed upon Santisteven in 1978. The Superintendent contends that Santisteven is not entitled to the credits claimed. We agree, and therefore reverse and remand with directions.

I

On August…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Schubert v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. People v. McKennaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. Godbold v. District Court in & for the Twenty-First Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. Schooley v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beecroft v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. People v. HoecherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Williamson v. JordanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. Wiedemer v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. People v. BrayColorado Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API