Legal Opinion

Qureshi v. District Court Ex Rel. Second Judicial District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 14, 1986No. 86SA237PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOLLACK, Justice.

Pursuant to C.A.R. 21, petitioner seeks relief in the nature of mandamus, challenging the legality of the consecutive sentences imposed by the trial court, as well as the imposition of a period of parole as a part of that sentence. We issued a rule to show cause. We now discharge that rule as to the imposition of the consecutive sentencing and make the rule absolute as to the imposition of a period of parole as a part of that sentence.

I

It is undisputed that petitioner, Tasneem Qureshi, attacked his wife and that she suffered serious injury. The victim suffered three major…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. People v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. People v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  4. People v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Valerio Ernest Miranda v. Thomas Cooper, Superintendent, and Frank Gunter, (Gunther) Sic, Director, D.O.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. People v. HoganColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Juhl v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  4. People v. PageColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. MooreColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API