Legal Opinion
HAC, INC. v. Box
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 14, 2010No. 107,786PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, V.C.J.
T1 The dispositive question presented in this appeal is whether the Workers' Compensation Court erred in finding the claimant was an innocent victim of "horseplay." We conclude that the trial judge's finding of fact that Robert Shane Box was an innocent vie-tim in the January 22, 2009 horseplay incident is not supported by competent evidence. We hold the three-judge panel erred as a matter of law in finding that the trial judge's order was not against the clear weight of the evidence.
I. Facts and Proceedings
{2 Robert Shane Box (Box) stocked shelves at the Homeland grocery store…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thomas v. Keith Hensel Optical LabsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Willis v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Lanman v. Oklahoma County Sheriff's OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Darco Transportation v. DulenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Silver Creek Investments, Inc. v. Whitten Construction Management, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- Westoak Industries, Inc. v. DeLeonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- DURANT METAL SHREDDING v. StapletonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
- LMR Oil, LLC v. FrazierCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- MOBILE MINI, INC. v. DuggerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.