Legal Opinion

Bryan v. Grosse

California Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1909No. L.A. No. 2158PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

In 1894 Mrs. M. J. Turner and Abbott Kinney entered into an agreement whereby certain reciprocal easements were sought to be created with reference to their adjoining parcels of land in the city of Los Angeles. Appellant Bryan and respondent Grosse became possessed, through mesne conveyances, of the respective interests of Mrs. Turner and Kinney, Grosse’s title being subject, however, to a thirty-year leasehold interest of the other respondent, the Development Building Company.

A complaint was filed by Bryan in which he asked to have his title quieted to the property formerly owned by Mrs.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ladd v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  2. Keats v. HugoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Los Angeles Terminal Land Co. v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hunt v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Kennedy v. BurnapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. McBride v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Martin v. HolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Southwest Pipe Line Co. v. Empire Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API