Kennedy v. Burnap
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgmer ; of the Superior Court of Sau Diego County. W. L. Pierce, Ju je. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action for an injunction. The defendant Burnap had judgment, from which plaintiff appeals on the judgment-roll, including bill of exceptions presenting motion to strike out certain allegations in the amended complaint, and the ruling of the court thereon.
But two questions are involved: "1. That the court erred in sustaining the demurrer made on the ground of misjoinder of parties defendant: and 2. That the court erred in sustaining the demurrer as to that portion of the amended complaint relating to light and air; and for like reasons the court erred in striking from the amended…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parker & Edgarton v. FooteNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Keats v. HugoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Story v. OdinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
- Morrison v. MarquardtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Bryan v. GrosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Griffin v. NorthridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Katcher v. Home Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Taliaferro v. SalyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.