Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bunstine

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2012No. 2011-0647PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Edward Royal Bunstine, of Chillicothe, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0030127, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1981. In August 2010, relator, disciplinary counsel, filed a complaint against respondent, alleging that his actions in a criminal investigation involving acquaintances violated Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(c) (a lawyer shall not engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), 8.4(d) (a lawyer shall not engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice), and 8.4(h) (a lawyer shall not engage in conduct that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. PotterOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Discipilnary Counsel v. RickettsOhio Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BunstineOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BunstineOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Owens.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API