Legal Opinion

Limbert v. Twin Falls County

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1998No. 23702PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the district court’s order granting the respondents’ motion for summary judgment. Mary Lyn Limbert filed claims alleging, inter alia, that the respondents were liable, pursuant to the Idaho Tort Claims Act, for injuries from a battery upon her and, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for violation of her constitutional rights. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The facts in this matter are undisputed. Limbert received a dog running-at-large citation and failed to appear in court to answer the charge. An arrest warrant was issued, and officer Barnhill of the Twin Falls…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nation v. State, Dept. of CorrectionIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. WorthingtonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Hagy v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. City of Saint Albans v. BotkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. City of Saint Albans v. BotkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API