Legal Opinion
State v. Worthington
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided November 20, 2002No. 27890PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
After being arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), Scott Arthur Worthington refused to submit to a breath test or blood test to determine alcohol concentration. He was therefore taken to a hospital, where a forcible blood draw was conducted. Worthington moved to suppress the results of the blood test on the ground that use of force to obtain the blood sample was unreasonable and violated his Fourth Amendment rights. Following the denial of that motion, Worthington entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving his right to appeal the suppression issue. We…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. WeaverIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DiazIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. DeWittIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. RobinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State of Idaho, Department of Transportation v. Marvin GibbarIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. TackettOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.