Legal Opinion
David Hulsey, and Gary Davis v. Kmart, Inc., a Michigan Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 27, 1994No. 93-5234PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
David Hulsey and Gary Davis appeal the magistrate judge’s entry of summary judgment dismissing their suit for age discrimination on the ground it is time-barred. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm.
BACKGROUND
Mr. Hulsey began his employment with Kmart in 1972. In 1985 he was promoted to the position of store manager at Kmart’s Bartlesville, Oklahoma, store. He served in that capacity until February 9,1990, at which time he was demoted to the position of local operations assistant manager and transferred to a Kmart store in Memphis, Tennessee. At the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harold R. PRICE, Appellant, v. LITTON BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Martinez v. OrrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Lukovsky v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Davidson v. America Online, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Eck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.