Legal Opinion

Dahl v. Collette

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 5, 1940No. Nos. 32,412, 32,413PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Winona Dahl sues to recover for damages to her automobile which she alleges it sustained in a collision while it was being driven by Peter C. Dahl with her consent, caused by the negligence of defendant Collette driving his own car as the corporate defendant’s employe in the course of his employment. C. M. Dahl as administrator sues to recover damages for the wrongful death of Peter C. Dahl, which he alleges was caused in the same accident. Plaintiffs recovered verdicts. The corporate defendant appeals in each case from the judgment.

These cases present only the question…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dehaan v. WolffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Chandler v. BuchananSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Hermanson v. SwitzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. Guthrie v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Abraham v. BymanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Kraus v. SaffertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Pierce v. Grand Army of the RepublicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Rose v. Western States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API