Legal Opinion
Mannix v. Frost
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1917PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Motion for an injunction pendente lite.
1Opinion of the CourtRudd, J.
The plaintiff moves, under an order to show cause, for an injunction pendente lite restraining defendants from enforcing order No. 31 of the board of health of the city of Albany, which order provides that no milk dealer shall sell loose or dipped milk in the city of Albany after April 1,1917.
The ground upon which the motion is based is that the order is unconstitutional and therefore void.
The complaint recites that the plaintiff for more than twenty years has been a retail dealer in milk and cream, and during all of that time has sold such articles in the city of Albany at retail, and that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Polinsky v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- People v. . FrudenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Coler v. American Society for Prevention of Cruelty To AnimalsNew York Supreme Court · 1908
- Gredinger v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- People ex rel. Schulz v. HamiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gilchrist Drug Co. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Magan Medical Clinic v. Cal. State Bd. of Med. ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People ex rel. Ogden v. McGowanNew York Supreme Court · 1921
- Village of Herkimer v. PotterNew York Supreme Court · 1924