Legal Opinion
Gilchrist Drug Co. v. City of Birmingham
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 22, 1937No. 6 Div. 71PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
Complainant, within the police jurisdiction of the City of Birmingham, is operating a drug store in which is made and sold to the public ice cream manufactured by what is known ,as the “counter freezer” method, and seeks in this proceeding injunctive relief against the enforcement of an ordinance of the City of Birmingham, requiring its manufacture by a different process referred to as the “pasteurized continuous flow method,” as found in the City Code, as follows: “Sect. 5249. (g). All ingredients used in the manufacture of ice cream or other frozen substances, composed in…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Minnesota v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Jay Burns Baking Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Schollenberger v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Weaver v. Palmer Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hebe Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- James v. ToddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Board of Trustees of Employees' Retirement System v. TalleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- City of Birmingham v. WestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Magan Medical Clinic v. Cal. State Bd. of Med. ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.