Legal Opinion

Village of Herkimer v. Potter

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Edgcomb, J.:

This action is brought to restrain the defendant from selling, peddling or delivering milk or cream in the village of Herkimer, because of his violation of various regulations prescribed by an ordinance governing the sale of milk and cream in the village, and to recover certain penalties therein mentioned, which ordinance was duly adopted by the board of health of the village of Herkimer, and went into effect October 1, 1924. An injunction pendente lite was granted, which the defendant now moves to vacate.

The ordinance forbids any person or corporation to sell, peddle or offer for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Lieberman v. Van De CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. People Ex Rel. Nechamcus v. Warden of the City PrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Matter of ViemeisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. People Ex Rel. Lieberman v. . VandecarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Polinsky v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Loftus v. Department of Agriculture of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. People v. TeuscherNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Guyle v. City of AuburnNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API