North American Processing Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Chief Judge.
The United States (defendant or government) moves for rehearing, modification, and/or reconsideration pursuant to U.S. CIT R. 59(a) of this Court’s order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment. See North American Processing Co. v. United States, 1998 WL 72811, Slip Op. 98-13 (CIT Feb. 19, 1998). In the alternative, defendant moves in limine to exclude certain evidence and additionally moves for oral argument. North American Processing Company (plaintiff or North American) opposes the government’s motions, contending, among other things, sufficient evidence…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- William F. Curtin v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Univar U.S. Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Boynton v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Kahrs International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009