Legal Opinion

Boynton v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 7, 2008No. Slip-Op. 08-49; Court 06-00095Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

POGUE, Judge.

Plaintiff, Sherri N. Boynton (“Boynton”) moves for rehearing, claiming that the Defendant’s failure to consider, in prior proceedings, certain judgments that Boynton obtained against various importers renders these proceedings fundamentally unfair.

This Court has jurisdiction to grant a rehearing under USCIT Rule 59(a)(2). See also Am. Nat’l Fire Ins. Co. v. United States, 200 Ct. Int. Trade LEXIS 137, *2 (citing United States v. Gold Mountain Coffee, Ltd., 8 CIT 336, 336, 601 F.Supp. 212, 214 (1984)); Kerr-McGee Chem. Corp. v. United States, 14 CIT 582, 583…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Gold Mountain Coffee, Ltd.United States Court of International Trade · 1984
  2. Belfont Sales Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  3. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  4. Boynton v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  5. North American Processing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API