Legal Opinion
Stenger v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 26, 1989No. CX-89-1393PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellants John and Elizabeth Stenger appeal from summary judgment which denied a writ of mandamus to allow an inverse condemnation action. Respondents’ motion, which requested dismissal of appellants’ petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, was treated by all parties as one for summary judgment in accordance with Minn.R.Civ. Proc. 12.02 (1988).
FACTS
Appellants purchased property on Lake Washington in Le Sueur County in 1976. They intended to build a permanent retirement home on the property. In 1983 the Department of Natural Resources…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Harvet v. Unity Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vern Reynolds Construction, Inc. v. City of ChamplinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- County of Isanti v. Keith Allen Kiefer, and third party v. City of Ramsey, Third PartyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. David P Williams, doing business as Bear Track ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025