Legal Opinion
Freedman v. America Online, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 4, 2004No. CIV. 303CV1048PCDPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1
DORSEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on Counts One, Ten, and Eleven of the Complaint. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs motion [Doc. No. 40] is granted in part and denied in part.
1. Background 2 > 3
On or about April 1, 2003, Defendants William Young and David Bensey executed a State of Connecticut Superior Court Search and Seizure Warrant Application. 4 Defendants allege that Young completed the Warrant Application and that Bensey witnessed his signature on the document.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gonzales v. Google, Inc.District Court, D. North Carolina · 2006
- Freedman v. America Online, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Airbnb, Inc. v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Mink v. SalazarDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- Shariff v. GoordDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.