Legal Opinion
Borden Co. v. Borella
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 18, 1945No. 688PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy
Once again, as in Kirschbaum Co. v. Walling, 316 U. S. 517, we are required to consider the application of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 19381 to employees engaged in activities relating to the maintenance and operation of a building.
In the Kirschbaum case we held that the Act does apply to such employees working in a loft building in which large quantities of goods for interstate commerce are physically produced. In the instant case, the porters, elevator operators and night watchmen in question work in a 24-story office building in the business district of New York City. The building is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Walton v. Southern Package Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Stoike v. First National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- International Business MacHines Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Mitchell v. H. B. Zachry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Bozant v. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.