Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kerner v. State Teachers Retirement Board

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1998No. 97-1188PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

In his propositions of law, Kerner essentially asserts that the court of appeals erred in denying the writ. Kerner claims that the requested names and addresses of STRS members who have completed five years of service credit and who have made no contributions during the preceding school year are public records that must be disclosed under R.C. 149.43. For the reasons that follow, Kerner’s argument lacks merit, and we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Initially, as the board cogently noted both below and on appeal, it has no duty to create a new document by searching for and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Scanlon v. DetersOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State ex rel. Lanham v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State, Ex Rel. Kinsley v. Berea Bd. of Edn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Morgan v. City of New LexingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Taxpayers Coalition v. City of LakewoodOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Office of the State Court Administrator v. Background Information Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Carr v. London Correctional InstitutionOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State ex rel. White v. GoldsberryOhio Supreme Court · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API