Legal Opinion

State ex rel. White v. Goldsberry

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1999No. 98-2285PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

White asserts in his sole proposition of law that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his mandamus action. For the reasons that follow, however, White’s contentions lack merit.

First, the records sought by White do not exist, and appellees have no duty under R.C. 149.43 to create new records by searching for and compiling information from existing records. State ex rel. Kerner v. State Teachers Retirement Bd. (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 273, 274, 695 N.E.2d 256, 258; State ex rel. Lanham v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 425, 427, 687 N.E.2d 283, 285.

Second, appellees had no duty…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Zanders v. Ohio Parole BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Alford v. WintersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Lanham v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Kerner v. State Teachers Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Sampson v. ParrottOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hunter v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Hunter v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Salemi v. Cleveland MetroparksOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Sekermestrovich v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Norris v. BudgakeOhio Supreme Court · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API