Legal Opinion

Deichler v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 16, 1992No. 302 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARBIERI, Senior Judge.

Before this court is the appeal of George Deichler (Claimant) from the majority order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board), reversing a portion of the referee’s decision computing Claimant’s Average Weekly Wage by including earnings from a single entrepreneur business in which the Claimant was the Employer, sole owner and sole employee. We will affirm the Board.

Claimant was injured on November 9, 1988, in the course of his employment with Emhart/True Temper (Employer) for which compensation is being paid him for the loss of use of two fingers. In the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rhoads Et Ux. v. Lancaster Park. Auth.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Metzgar v. General RefractoriesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. B & T Trucking v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Capuano v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. ANR Freight System v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Borough of Honesdale v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Hartman v. Clarke County HomemakersCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API