Legal Opinion
Rhoads Et Ux. v. Lancaster Park. Auth.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 22, 1987No. Appeal, 32 T. D. 1985PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge Doyle,
This is an appeal by Daniel Rhoads and Mary Rhoads from two orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County granting summary judgment to Appellees, Lancaster Parking Authority and the City of Lancaster. We affirm.
In late 1966 and early 1967, the Lancaster Parking Authority (Authority) was organized pursuant to the Parking Authority Law. The Authority owns the Prince Street Parking Garage in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, which it leases to the City of Lancaster (City) and in turn, staffs and operates the garage pursuant to a management contract with the City. It is…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Ford v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Farber v. ENGLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Sphere Drake Insurance v. Philadelphia Gas WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- E-Z Parks, Inc. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Friedlander v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- School District v. Hamot Medical CenterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.