Vickla v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
After pleading guilty to offering forged checks in an amount greater than $35,000, waiving his right to a jury trial on the sentencing issues, and admitting he qualified as a career offender under Minn.Stat. § 609.1095, subd. 4 (2010), respondent William Paul Vickla received the statutory-maximum sentence of 240 months.1 Vickla filed a petition for postconviction relief, arguing that the district court erred when it imposed the statutory-maximum sentence for his conviction. The postconviction court denied the petition, but the court of appeals reversed and remanded for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. WorthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. LeathersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Jason Donald Matakis v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Justin Dillard ThomasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Martin David Hutchins, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.