Legal Opinion

Vickla v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 2011No. A09-830PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Justice.

After pleading guilty to offering forged checks in an amount greater than $35,000, waiving his right to a jury trial on the sentencing issues, and admitting he qualified as a career offender under Minn.Stat. § 609.1095, subd. 4 (2010), respondent William Paul Vickla received the statutory-maximum sentence of 240 months.1 Vickla filed a petition for postconviction relief, arguing that the district court erred when it imposed the statutory-maximum sentence for his conviction. The postconviction court denied the petition, but the court of appeals reversed and remanded for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. State v. WorthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. LeathersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Jason Donald Matakis v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  4. State of Minnesota v. Justin Dillard ThomasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  5. State of Minnesota v. Martin David Hutchins, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API